Stormy Daniels shoots down rump attorney claim she made up sex story

[wvit1001]

Stormy Daniels shoots down Trump attorney’s claims she made up sex story: ‘If it was untrue, I would’ve written it better’

Trump’s defense attorney suggested the adult film star shouldn’t be shocked by the sight of him in his underwear


Over two hours of fierce cross examination from Donald Trump’s legal team on Thursday, Stormy Daniels fought off attacks designed to undermine her credibility and cast her as a liar and opportunist.

In a series of quippy relies to Mr Trump’s attorney, she said that if if her account of having sex with the former president wasn’t true, “I would’ve written it better.”

The adult film star’s detailed account of a sexual encounter with the former president in 2006 came under intense scrutiny across seven hours over two days inside a Manhattan courtroom, where Mr Trump stands criminally accused of covering up payments intended to keep her quiet during the 2016 presidential election.

On Thursday, defense attorney Susan Necheles tried to dissect her testimony about having sex with Mr Trump in a hotel room to find inconsistencies from her accounts of the meeting in interviews and in her book.

But Ms Daniels appeared unflappable – leaning comfortably on the stand and firing quips back to Ms Necheles as if the questions were beneath her.

At one point, Ms Necheles suggested that the appearance of Mr Trump in his underwear asking for sex shouldn’t have shocked her because she would be used to seeing naked men in her line of work.

“You’ve acted and had sex in over 200 porn movies, right?” she said. “And there are naked men and naked women having sex in those movies? … But according to you, seeing a man sitting on a bed in a T-shirt and boxer shorts was so upsetting you became light-headed and almost fainted?”

“When you’re not expecting a man twice your age, yes,” Ms Daniels fired back.

Ms Necheles often punctuated a line of questions to directly ask whether Ms Daniels is lying or “making this stuff up.”

“This was your career for over 20 years, writing, acting, and directing sex films,” she asked. “You have a lot of experience making phoney stories about sex appear real, right?”

“Wow,” Ms Daniel replied, pausing to laugh.

“That’s not how I would put it,” she said. “The sex in those films is very much real – just like in that hotel room.”

If her account wasn’t true, she said, “I would’ve written it better.”



https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/stormy-daniels-trump-trial-cross-exam-b2542509.html

[zsq987]

There is no one more credible than a dried-up worn-out (literally) porn actress.

[wvit1001]

Except for a dried up, worn out old orange faced, dyed hair con artist.

[sine-qua-non]

Yep, Trump has the credibility issue hands down

Looks like she had a bad day in court all around ….

CNN Legal Analyst Says Stormy Daniels Testimony Backfired: ‘Her Responses Were Disastrous’

A CNN legal expert told the network the testimony of porn star Stormy Daniels in former President Donald Trump’s “hush money” case was detrimental for Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s case.

CNN legal analyst Elie Honig on Tuesday evening described Daniels’ responses during cross-examination as “disastrous” for prosecutors, saying her hatred for Trump undermined the credibility of the case.

[wvit1001]

she may be a porn star but at least she's not a lying con artist like the old orange conman and scam artist who falisfied business records to hide the payments he made to her from his wife. 

[sine-qua-non]

Yep, Trump has the credibility issue hands down

Looks like she had a bad day in court all around ….

CNN Legal Analyst Says Stormy Daniels Testimony Backfired: ‘Her Responses Were Disastrous’

A CNN legal expert told the network the testimony of porn star Stormy Daniels in former President Donald Trump’s “hush money” case was detrimental for Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s case.

CNN legal analyst Elie Honig on Tuesday evening described Daniels’ responses during cross-examination as “disastrous” for prosecutors, saying her hatred for Trump undermined the credibility of the case.


Braggs case is falling apart Because it’s a case that never was !

[wvit1001]

no links, all fraud.   

[sine-qua-non]

CNN is all fraud

That’s YOUR propaganda arm for the dementia Pedo CCP compromised traitor Cho Xiden crime syndicate silly zippy

Bwahahahahahaha

[Dan]

cLifford disagrees with Trump attorney

So?