|
Title: NO. 1 RESPONSIBILITY OF A PRESIDENT IS SECURITY, R. PAUL HASN'T A CLUE Post by: mudslinger on 12 15, 11, 05:36:55:AM (http://www.aesopsretreat.com/forum/Smileys/classic/emo_hattip.gif)(http://www.aesopsretreat.com/forum/Smileys/classic/emo_hattip.gif)(http://www.aesopsretreat.com/forum/Smileys/classic/107w9oy.gif)
Title: Re: NO. 1 RESPONSIBILITY OF A PRESIDENT IS SECURITY, R. PAUL HASN'T A Post by: hoosier_daddy on 12 15, 11, 05:52:26:AM how did invading iraq on lies and letting bin laden go while occupying the rest of afghanistan where BIN LADEN WAS NOT for the last 10 years help our national security? try to think...bush screwed the pooch so badly militarily even ron paul could do better.
Title: Re: NO. 1 RESPONSIBILITY OF A PRESIDENT IS SECURITY, R. PAUL HASN'T A Post by: mudslinger on 12 15, 11, 06:03:06:AM If they were lies they were Bill Clinton's lies.
Title: Re: NO. 1 RESPONSIBILITY OF A PRESIDENT IS SECURITY, R. PAUL HASN'T A Post by: Me_Beavis_U on 12 15, 11, 06:14:55:AM Where does it say that in the Constitution? It may be in his Oath of Office, but it does not say SECURITY is the President #1 anything.
Title: Re: NO. 1 RESPONSIBILITY OF A PRESIDENT IS SECURITY, R. PAUL HASN'T A Post by: mudslinger on 12 15, 11, 06:17:02:AM http://www.youtube.com/v/S0f5u_0ytUs
Title: Re: NO. 1 RESPONSIBILITY OF A PRESIDENT IS SECURITY, R. PAUL HASN'T A Post by: hoosier_daddy on 12 15, 11, 07:18:16:AM so what? from 5 years BEFORE bush invaded, and BEFORE blix had been allowed back into iraq with complete access and found no traces of this shit. why do you use 5 year old tape to try and justify bush's lies?
Title: Re: NO. 1 RESPONSIBILITY OF A PRESIDENT IS SECURITY, R. PAUL HASN'T A Post by: Me_Beavis_U on 12 15, 11, 07:23:46:AM DENIAL DENIAL DENIAL. STFU HOOTY. Prove Bush INTENDED to lie when he took any actions. Bush was an Honorable man , Not like ones you are obviously used too, since you support obama , and act the way you do.
http://www.rightwingnews.com/quotes/demsonwmds.php Title: Re: NO. 1 RESPONSIBILITY OF A PRESIDENT IS SECURITY, R. PAUL HASN'T A Post by: lluke47 on 12 15, 11, 07:25:01:AM The alleged lies you liberals say came from Bush actually were told to him by the liberals, only you liberals don't have the balls to take any responsibility..
That's why liberals don't make good leaders, they are cowards.. Title: Re: NO. 1 RESPONSIBILITY OF A PRESIDENT IS SECURITY, R. PAUL HASN'T A Post by: mudslinger on 12 15, 11, 07:27:36:AM Clinton's head of the CIA Tenet was also Bush's CIA head, he brought Clinton's intelligence info with him. You dumb peckerhead ho daddy.
Title: Re: NO. 1 RESPONSIBILITY OF A PRESIDENT IS SECURITY, R. PAUL HASN'T A Post by: Me_Beavis_U on 12 15, 11, 07:30:58:AM Clinton's head of the CIA Tenet was also Bush's CIA head, he brought Clinton's intelligence info with him. You dumb peckerhead ho daddy. Hooty knew that because he believes he is obviously the smartest person here. That's is why he is so ridiculous with this Bullshit daily. Title: Re: NO. 1 RESPONSIBILITY OF A PRESIDENT IS SECURITY, R. PAUL HASN'T A Post by: hoosier_daddy on 12 15, 11, 07:37:38:AM what are you even talking about? the president does not collect information, or tell the CIA how to do its job- Clinton's intelligence briefings about iraq was the same as what bush got...it doesn't vary from president to president...even though blix had been on the ground for 4 months with complete access and FOUND NO TRACES, AND THEN BUSH SAID THERE WAS NO DOUBT HUSSEIN HAD THIS SHIT...AND YOU FUCKERS DO NOT CALL THAT A LIE? there is no sense trying to argue with people that fucking stupid...
Title: Re: NO. 1 RESPONSIBILITY OF A PRESIDENT IS SECURITY, R. PAUL HASN'T A Post by: Me_Beavis_U on 12 15, 11, 07:39:43:AM Look at that bullshit
HOOTY, YOU PROVED NOTHING. Waste of space between your ears. You really believe that the only reason we went into Iraq was WMD's? Russian and the United States sold them to Saddam, we just did not know where they went and they are controlled substances, like nuclear products. We sure didn't want to bomb them and spread them around a large area during the invasion. When we invaded Iraq, screaming shit like you were claiming Bush was invading to steal their oil for his BIG OIL BUDDIES... Title: Re: NO. 1 RESPONSIBILITY OF A PRESIDENT IS SECURITY, R. PAUL HASN'T A Post by: mudslinger on 12 15, 11, 07:42:06:AM You are right hooty you dumbshit through your own admission, intelligence doesn't vary from President to President, that is why Bush used the intelligence gathered by the Clinton Administration, boy are you ever a stupid person.
Title: Re: NO. 1 RESPONSIBILITY OF A PRESIDENT IS SECURITY, R. PAUL HASN'T A Post by: hoosier_daddy on 12 15, 11, 08:36:06:AM we didn't sell any wmds to iraq, dumbfuck. and neither did russia. of course hussein had chemical weapons, he used them against the iranians and the kurds in the 80's when reagan was president and hussein was our number one buddy in the region. chemical weapons are really nothing more than bug spray, only times 100. any country can make it, if they want to break international law and risk sanctions. and chemical weapons are not really any more lethal than conventional weapons, but they are banned because they cause such gruesome and painful deaths, not because they are so effective. but chemical weapons manfuctured in the 80's and maybe early 90's would not be viable a decade later. it would be more dangerous for those trying to use them than for the enemy. what part of that don't you understand? ten year old caches of chemical weapons are not weaponized, they are just dangerous to whoever is around them. and he never had biological weapons to any weaponized state, even we do not have that capacity right now. and we know he did not have nuclear programs because that creates isotopes that are released into the atmosphere and can be detected....the whole idea that hussein was so dangerous that only an all out invasion and occupation could stop him is totally preposterous. he was not any more dangerous than milosevic, and clinton took him out and put him on trial before the world court WITHOUT LOSING ONE SOLDIER IN COMBAT....
Title: Re: NO. 1 RESPONSIBILITY OF A PRESIDENT IS SECURITY, R. PAUL HASN'T A Post by: Oz on 12 15, 11, 09:30:11:AM Somehow you keep ignoring the FACTS that Scott Ritter and UNSCOM, El Bardi and the IAEA and Hanx Blix and UNMOVIC had all inspected Iraq and said, loud and clear, there were NO WMD.
The IAEA had inspected every 6 months, just like they do anyplace that has nuclear materials, to keep it safe, and certified Iraq had NO NUKES. (No "mushroom clouds.") NO WMD before the war. None. And in 2001, Condoleeza Rice and General Colin Powell said Iraq had NO WMD and WAS NOT A THREAT: http://www.cs.cornell.edu/gries/howbushoperates/powell-no-wmd.htm (http://www.cs.cornell.edu/gries/howbushoperates/powell-no-wmd.htm) |