But he's going to allow them to Vote anyways.
Why? Because he's a Democrat and he believes "he" makes the rules.





Arizona election database flags 100,000 voters as possible noncitizens
Arizona's Democratic secretary of state said he is 'unwilling' to restrict potential noncitizen voters to a federal-only ballot
 

(https://a57.foxnews.com/static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2024/08/331/186/GettyImages-1768977939-scaled-e1723117766734.jpg)


 A "coding oversight" in state software is calling into question the citizenship status of 100,000 registered Arizona voters, prompting the state's Democratic secretary of state to insist he will send out ballots to those affected anyway.


https://www.foxnews.com/politics/arizona-election-database-flags-100000-voters-possible-noncitizens-coding-oversight
 

And we will be seeing this evidence when Commie Crow?  You M&Ms have presented this exact same claim a number of times.  What is different about this time Commie Crow?  DAM₂N (http://www.aesopsretreat.com/forum/Smileys/classic/107w9oy.gif)

jimmyboob doesn't care about evidence, all jimmyboob cares about is spreading his anti America shit.

why are you the way you are jimmyboob?

Commies don't care if non-citizens vote.  They have been working hard at it.

Where is your evidence?  You have yet to provide any!

Plausible deniability is what Democrats are best at!

The only plausible deniability here is the non-citizens finally became citizens.  But, no one can determine how many, if any did.

That is their plausible deniability!  They were in this case smart enough to have an out if they were caught!

THIS s evidence that the GOP wants to create a Police State.

If you don't like it, then move to a Liberal state with rights!

Yeah, a police state where only citizens vote.  Oh, the horror!

???

Preventing prohibited people from voting is "creating a police state"?

How so?

(https://preview.redd.it/she-is-fueling-my-nightmares-v0-h5b69ycsylpd1.jpeg?width=640&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=5ccc07a4af2ab5cdaacf10e458b38f0cf6fc0892)

No answer as expected!

Democrats are the party of the incompetent and the ignorant!

Under new GOP Arizona voting law requiring proof of citizenship, Republicans overwhelmingly failed to prove citizenship 33% more than Democrats


(https://preview.redd.it/under-new-gop-arizona-voting-law-requiring-proof-of-v0-gn86i5kionpd1.jpeg?width=640&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=9fb52793710f23e9c76837e76eaca54bb098ab95)

In 2005, the U.S. Government Accountability Office found that up to 3 percent of the 30,000 individuals called for jury duty from voter registration rolls over a
two-year period in just one U.S. district court were not U.S. citizens.[1] (https://www.heritage.org/report/the-threat-non-citizen-voting#_ftn1)

While that may not seem like many, just 3 percent of registered voters would have been more than enough to provide the winning presidential vote margin in Florida in 2000.

Indeed, the Census Bureau estimates that there are over a million illegal aliens in Florida,[2] (https://www.heritage.org/report/the-threat-non-citizen-voting#_ftn2) and the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has prosecuted more non-citizen voting cases in Florida than in any other state.  [3] (https://www.heritage.org/report/the-threat-non-citizen-voting#_ftn3)

https://www.heritage.org/report/the-threat-non-citizen-voting

Do you know where they go to find jurors?

Voter rolls!

That means at least 3 percent of voters are illegals!

More than enough to swing several elections in the favor of Democrats!

Every foreigner who votes steals an American's vote!

Democrats, why doesn't that offend you?

GOP voters could be Russian Agents,
Treasonous Dogs,
Murderers,
Rapists,
or Felons.

NONE of them should be allowed to vote.

Truman says foreigners are more important than American citizens!

Most of the people on the list of 100,000 possible non citizens are republicans.   So this list turns out to be another GOP self own. 

Arizona court says 98K voters impacted by coding error can vote full ballot in fall


The Arizona Supreme Court said Friday that nearly 100,000 voters stuck in limbo following a citizenship tracking error will be allowed to vote a full ballot in November.

The decision temporarily resolves a quandary that could have disenfranchised the group and swayed down-ballot races across the state.


https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/09/20/court-voters-impacted-by-coding-error-will-get-full-ballot/75310040007/

Based on what?

I see no evidence to back up that conclusion!

Chief Justice Ann Scott Timmer (Republican) also noted that the affected voters had previously been registered to vote a full ballot and that election officials did not suggest that they had any reason to believe the impacted voters were not citizens.

"We are unwilling on these facts to disenfranchise voters en masse from participating in state contests," Timmer wrote. "Doing so is not authorized by state law and would violate principles of due process."

So, there is no proof they are not illegals!

Chief Justice Ann Scott Timmer (Republican) also noted that the affected voters had previously been registered to vote a full ballot and that election officials did not suggest that they had any reason to believe the impacted voters were not citizens.

"We are unwilling on these facts to disenfranchise voters en masse from participating in state contests," Timmer wrote. "Doing so is not authorized by state law and would violate principles of due process."

And we will be seeing this evidence when Commie Crow? 
 

 Is NOW too soon?

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/arizona-supreme-court-rules-98000-people-citizenship-unconfirmed-vote-pivotal-election

Since when do Democrats care about due process?

So, there is no proof they are not illegals!

so you think republican judges running the Arizona Supreme Court are against the republican party?

 
We don't care who it is that is wrong.    Wrong is still wrong.   Did you really think that would matter?   We're not loyal Democrats anymore.
 

evidently the Arizona Supreme Court with their many many years of experience don't think they were wrong jim.   What kind of law did you study college jim?